Case 2600711/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Ms S Hadadi v Fitpack Fitness Limited — 2026
- Case reference
- 2600711/2022
- Decision date
- 30 April 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Adkinson Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms S Hadadi
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was issued on 8 March 2022 and the respondent failed to present a valid response on time. The Employment Judge therefore determined the claim, or part of it, under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013.
On that basis, the tribunal found that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages and ordered payment of £1,027.48 gross. It also found that the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded damages of £237.11 gross.
The tribunal further found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £727.26. It also found that there had been no attempt to comply with the duty to provide written particulars or updated particulars of employment and, because no good reason was advanced for that failure, considered an award of 4 weeks' pay to be just and equitable. That award was fixed at £948.44.
All future hearings were cancelled. The total award recorded in the judgment is £2,940.29.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages. | Upheld | — | £1,027 |
| Breach of contract | Damages were awarded for dismissal in breach of contract in respect of notice. | Upheld | — | £237 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement. | Upheld | — | £727 |
| Other | Award for failure to provide written particulars or updated particulars of employment; the tribunal said an award of 4 weeks' pay was just and equitable. | Upheld | — | £948 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,940
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.