Case 2600715/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J A G M Attride v Homesource4U Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 2600715/2023
- Decision date
- 11 November 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ahmed Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J A G M Attride
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy letter dated 4 October 2024, the Tribunal gave Homesource4U Limited an opportunity to make written representations or request a hearing on why its response should not be struck out. The stated reasons were that the respondent had not complied with the Tribunal's Order dated 14 May 2024 and that the response had not been actively pursued.
The respondent did not make representations in writing, did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. The Employment Judge therefore struck out the response. The judgment also records that the respondent remains entitled to notice of any hearings and decisions of the Tribunal, but may only participate in any hearing to the extent permitted by the Employment Judge.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The Tribunal struck out the respondent's response after giving the respondent an opportunity by letter dated 4 October 2024 to explain why strike out should not follow non-compliance with the Order dated 14 May 2024 and the failure to actively pursue the response. No merits determination is recorded in this judgment. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.