Case 2600731/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs S Giles v Qube Qualifications and Development Ltd (in Creditors Voluntary Liquidation and 1 other — 2025
- Case reference
- 2600731/2023
- Decision date
- 27 March 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Shastri-Hurst Date
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Mrs S Giles
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal found that the first respondent's premises in Abingdon constituted an establishment for the purposes of s188 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992, and that there was no recognised trade union or appointed or elected employee representatives. The complaint that the respondent failed to comply with the s188 consultation requirement was upheld, and a protective award was made in the claimant's favour for the 90-day protected period beginning 28 March 2023, totalling £6,801.01.
The tribunal further found the claimant's complaints of breach of contract in respect of notice pay, and of unpaid holiday pay under regulations 14(2) and/or 16(1) of the Working Time Regulations 1998, to be well-founded, awarding £1,793.84 (4 weeks' net pay) and £687.51 respectively. Under s163 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 the tribunal also determined that the claimant was entitled to a redundancy payment of £1,586.55.
The judgment directs that credit is to be given for sums paid by the Redundancy Payments Service in relation to notice pay, holiday pay and redundancy pay. The judgment is short-form and does not set out detailed reasons or address remedy components such as a basic or compensatory award separately.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Protective award under s188 TULR(C)A 1992 for failure to consult; 90 days (12.86 weeks) from 28 March 2023. | Upheld | — | £6,801 |
| Breach of contract | Notice pay claim well-founded; 4 weeks' pay calculated on net pay. | Upheld | — | £1,794 |
| Holiday pay | Failure to pay in accordance with regulation 14(2) and/or 16(1) of the Working Time Regulations 1998. Claimant responsible for tax/NI. | Upheld | — | £688 |
| Redundancy | Entitlement determined under s163 Employment Rights Act 1996. | Upheld | — | £1,587 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £10,869
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
5 references- s188 Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992
- s188(1B) TULR(C)A 1992
- regulation 14(2) Working Time Regulations 1998
- regulation 16(1) Working Time Regulations 1998
- s163 Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.