Case 2600731/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v Capita plc — 2024
- Case reference
- 2600731/2024
- Decision date
- 22 August 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hutchinson
- Venue
- Leicester Heard
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a preliminary hearing before Employment Judge Hutchinson sitting alone, the claimant appeared in person and the respondent was represented by counsel. The judgment records that the claims before the tribunal were unfair dismissal, breach of contract, disability discrimination and race discrimination.
The tribunal's written record states that those claims were withdrawn and dismissed. No remedy was awarded in the written judgment, and no written reasons were provided because reasons were given orally at the hearing unless a party requested written reasons within the applicable time limit.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment records that the claim was withdrawn and dismissed. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The judgment records that the claim was withdrawn and dismissed. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | The judgment records that the claim was withdrawn and dismissed. | Withdrawn | Disability | — |
| Race discrimination | The judgment records that the claim was withdrawn and dismissed. | Withdrawn | Race | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.