Case 2600737/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr R Brahmbhatt v Kalsi Plastics (UK) Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 2600737/2020
- Decision date
- 12 August 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hutchinson Members
- Panel members
- Mr K P Chester, Ms R Wills
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr R Brahmbhatt
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal gave a unanimous judgment after a remote hearing on 19 and 20 July 2021. It recorded that Mr R Brahmbhatt's claim of unlawful deduction of wages was withdrawn and dismissed, and that his claims of unfair dismissal, breach of contract in respect of notice pay, and age discrimination each failed and were dismissed.
The written record does not include the tribunal's oral reasons. It states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days of the sending of the written record of the decision.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment states that the claim was withdrawn and dismissed. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The claim failed and was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The claim in respect of notice pay failed and was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Age discrimination | The age discrimination claim failed and was dismissed. | Dismissed | Age | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.