Case 2600739/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr R Clayton v Matlock Transport Company Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 2600739/2020
- Decision date
- 15 June 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Clark
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr R Clayton
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment in which Employment Judge Clark found that Matlock Transport Company Limited had made an unauthorised deduction from Mr R Clayton's wages. The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay the net sum of £2,400 in respect of that claim.
The tribunal also found that Mr Clayton had been unfairly dismissed. It ordered the respondent to pay compensation of £5,460. The extracted judgment does not break that compensation down into basic award, compensatory award, or interest, and it does not state any further findings beyond those two upheld claims.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Rule 21 judgment ordered the respondent to pay the net sum of £2,400 for an unauthorised deduction from wages. | Upheld | — | £2,400 |
| Unfair dismissal | Rule 21 judgment found the claimant was unfairly dismissed and ordered the respondent to pay compensation of £5,460. | Upheld | — | £5,460 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £7,860
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.