Case 2600741/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Brownhill v Riverside Car Sales Ltd — 2019
- Case reference
- 2600741/2019
- Decision date
- 17 December 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Adkinson
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J Brownhill
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe hearing took place on 17 December 2019 before Employment Judge Adkinson sitting alone. The claimant did not attend and was not represented. The tribunal noted that it had sent notices of the hearing to the contact email addresses provided by the parties in the ET1 and ET3, including notices sent on 19 October 2019 and 16 December 2019, and that the claimant had contacted the tribunal using the same email address after 19 October 2019.
After considering rule 47, the documents on the tribunal file, the bundle, and the evidence given on behalf of the respondent, the tribunal found that Mr Brownhill was not an employee or worker of Riverside Car Sales Ltd. On that basis, the tribunal said it could not consider a claim for unlawful deduction from wages or breach of contract.
The judgment therefore dismissed the claim. No remedy was awarded and no monetary figure was recorded in the decision.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found the claimant was not an employee or worker of the respondent, so it could not consider this claim. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found the claimant was not an employee or worker of the respondent, so it could not consider this claim. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.