Case 2600748/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr David Fox v Dako Construction Limited and 1 other — 2024
- Case reference
- 2600748/2023
- Decision date
- 14 February 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ahmed
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Mr David Fox
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal decided that Dako Construction Ltd (in Administration) failed to comply with the requirements of sections 188-190 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992. It found the claimant's complaint for a protective award to be well-founded and successful.
The Tribunal ordered Dako Construction Ltd (in Administration) to pay remuneration to the claimant by way of a protective award. The award was for a period of 90 days beginning on 13 January 2023, identified as the date on which the first of the dismissals to which the complaint related took effect.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Protective award complaint under sections 188-190 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992. The judgment orders remuneration for 90 days but gives no monetary figure. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- sections 188-190 of Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.