Case 2600755/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs A Sniadkowska v Max Plus Global UK Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 2600755/2019
- Decision date
- 22 January 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Jeram Dated
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs A Sniadkowska
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a strike-out judgment under rule 37. The tribunal recorded that by email dated 9 January 2020 it gave Mrs A Sniadkowska an opportunity to make representations as to why the claim should not be struck out for not having been actively pursued.
The claimant did not make representations in writing, or did not make any sufficient representations, explaining why the claim should not be struck out. On that basis, Employment Judge Jeram ordered that the claim be struck out.
The judgment does not identify any substantive liability findings and records no monetary award or remedy.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The extracted judgment does not identify the underlying substantive claim(s). It records only that the claim was struck out because it had not been actively pursued and the claimant did not make sufficient written representations in response to the tribunal's email of 9 January 2020. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.