Case 2600766/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Miss M Drew v Red Carpet Cleaning Services Limited (in Creditors Voluntary Liquidation) — 2024
- Case reference
- 2600766/2023
- Decision date
- 28 February 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hutchinson Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss M Drew
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was issued in the Midlands East Employment Tribunals on 11 April 2023. The respondent failed to present a valid response on time, and the Employment Judge determined the claim under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013. The respondent was at the time of judgment in Creditors Voluntary Liquidation.
The tribunal found that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages (£700 gross), that the claimant had been dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice (damages of £684.00), that she was dismissed by reason of redundancy and entitled to a redundancy payment of £1,029.00, and that the respondent had failed to pay her holiday entitlement (£510.00).
The respondent was ordered to pay the claimant £2,923.00 in total. The judgment was issued by Employment Judge Hutchinson on 28 February 2024.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Tribunal found unauthorised deductions from wages; respondent ordered to pay £700 gross. | Upheld | — | £700 |
| Breach of contract | Dismissal in breach of contract in respect of notice; damages of £684.00 awarded. | Upheld | — | £684 |
| Redundancy | Claimant dismissed by reason of redundancy; entitled to redundancy payment of £1,029.00. | Upheld | — | £1,029 |
| Holiday pay | Respondent failed to pay claimant's holiday entitlement; ordered to pay £510.00. Listed by gov.uk under Working Time Regulations. | Upheld | — | £510 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,923
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.