Case 2600776/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D Bharadia v Auto Safety Centre Ltd (In Creditors Voluntary Liquidation) — 2019
- Case reference
- 2600776/2019
- Decision date
- 20 November 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Clark
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr D Bharadia
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment is a strike out decision under rule 37. By a letter dated 27 August 2019, the Tribunal gave Mr D Bharadia an opportunity to make written representations, or to request a hearing, on why the claim should not be struck out because it had not been actively pursued.
The claimant did not make representations in writing, or did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. On that basis, Employment Judge Clark struck out the claim on 20 November 2019. The judgment records no substantive determination of the underlying merits and no remedy award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the substantive jurisdiction of the claim. It records that, by letter dated 27 August 2019, the Tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out for not having been actively pursued. The claimant did not make written representations, or did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 37
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.