Case 2600777/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs B Fernandez v National Probation Service — 2019
- Case reference
- 2600777/2019
- Decision date
- 1 July 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Britton
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs B Fernandez
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment in which Employment Judge Britton recorded that the claim succeeded. The judgment does not identify the substantive cause of action, only that the claimant was Mrs B Fernandez and the respondent was the National Probation Service.
The judgment states that the remedy due to the claimant would be determined at a later Remedy Hearing. It also records that the hearing listed for 26 July 2019 was extended to three hours, to begin at 10:00am at Leicester Hearing Centre, 5a New Walk, Leicester, LE1 6TE.
The claimant was directed to bring a schedule of loss with two copies and supporting documents in duplicate. No monetary award is set out in this judgment, and no split between heads of remedy is recorded.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The extracted judgment is a Rule 21 template and does not specify the underlying cause of action. The source listing categories refer to unlawful deduction from wages and working time, but that is not stated in the judgment text itself. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013, Rule 21
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.