Case 2600792/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Miss L Owen v Chipboard12 Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 2600792/2022
- Decision date
- 19 August 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge M Butler Appearances
- Venue
- Nottingham
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss L Owen
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe respondent failed to submit a response or attend the hearing. Employment Judge M Butler therefore entered judgment in favour of Miss L Owen under Rule 21. The tribunal ordered payment of £484.70 gross for accrued but unpaid holiday pay, £630.88 gross for unpaid notice pay, and £2,000 for injury to feelings in respect of pregnancy discrimination.
The judgment records a total award of £3,115.58. It does not set out detailed factual findings, witness evidence, or any cited legal tests beyond the default judgment and the specific award headings.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | Awarded as £484.70 gross in respect of accrued but unpaid holiday pay under the Rule 21 default judgment. | Upheld | — | £485 |
| Breach of contract | Awarded as £630.88 gross in respect of unpaid notice pay; the judgment does not label a separate cause of action, so this is mapped from the remedy description. | Upheld | — | £631 |
| Pregnancy and maternity discrimination | Awarded as £2,000 for injury to feelings in respect of pregnancy discrimination. | Upheld | Pregnancy and maternity | £2,000 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,116
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.