Case 2600795/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr B Lamontagne v Nottinghamshire County Council Adult Social Care Health And Public Protection — 2020
- Case reference
- 2600795/2020
- Decision date
- 1 June 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Victoria Butler
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr B Lamontagne
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant, Mr B Lamontagne, brought a claim against Nottinghamshire County Council Adult Social Care Health And Public Protection. On 14 May 2020 the tribunal wrote to him giving him an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing as to why the claim should not be struck out on the basis that it disclosed no course of action that could be pursued in the Employment Tribunal.
The claimant did not make sufficient representations and did not request a hearing. On that basis, Employment Judge Victoria Butler struck out the claim. The judgment records no merits determination, no liability findings, and no monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify a specific substantive claim type. The tribunal struck out the claim under rule 37 because it disclosed no course of action the claimant could pursue in the Employment Tribunal, and the claimant did not make sufficient representations or request a hearing. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 37
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.