Case 2600799/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Miss L Minton v Pine View Care Homes Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 2600799/2020
- Decision date
- 17 December 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Victoria Butler
- Venue
- Nottingham
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss L Minton
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis decision records that the hearing was held on 17 December 2020 before Employment Judge Victoria Butler sitting alone. The Respondent did not attend. The tribunal struck out the Respondent's response because the manner in which the proceedings had been conducted was said to be scandalous, unreasonable or vexatious, and because the Respondent had not complied with the Tribunal's orders dated 25 June 2020.
The judgment does not determine the merits of the claimant's underlying employment claims. Instead, it states that a remedy hearing will be listed and notified to the parties, and that the Respondent will be entitled to notice of that hearing but only to participate to the extent permitted by the Employment Judge.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not determine the underlying substantive claims; it strikes out the Respondent's response because of conduct and non-compliance with orders. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.