Case 2600803/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr C Blain v Creative Spaces Group Ltd T/a Creasy Garden Buildings — 2019
- Case reference
- 2600803/2019
- Decision date
- 6 August 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Clark
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr C Blain
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment in favour of Mr C Blain against Creative Spaces Group Ltd t/a Creasy Garden Buildings. The tribunal found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages and ordered payment of the gross sum of £1,112.80. It also found that the claimant had been dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded damages of £4,807.
The tribunal further found that the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and was entitled to a redundancy payment of £4,807. It also found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £428. The listed hearing on 22 August 2019 was cancelled. The judgment does not record any discrimination, unfair dismissal, or interest award, and it does not split the awards into any broader compensation categories beyond the sums ordered on each claim.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wrongful dismissal | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £4,807 |
| Redundancy | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £4,807 |
| Holiday pay | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £428 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £1,113 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £11,155
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.