Case 2600803/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Miss C Scott v Nationwide Healthcare Providers — 2022
- Case reference
- 2600803/2022
- Decision date
- 15 March 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Adkinson Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss C Scott
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was issued in the Midlands East Employment Tribunals and dealt with under rule 21 because Nationwide Healthcare Providers did not present a valid response on time. Employment Judge Adkinson decided that a determination could properly be made on the papers, and the hearing listed for 12 September 2022 was cancelled.
The tribunal found that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from Miss C Scott’s wages. The judgment records that the respondent must pay her £1,389 gross. No other claim types, legal tests, or separate remedy components are identified in the judgment text provided.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Rule 21 judgment: the respondent failed to present a valid response on time, and the Employment Judge determined the claim without a hearing. The tribunal found unauthorised deductions from wages and ordered payment of £1,389 gross. | Upheld | — | £1,389 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,389
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £1,389
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.