Case 2600808/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Miss J Rose v Millberry Care Agency Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 2600808/2021
- Decision date
- 13 August 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hutchinson Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss J Rose
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment against Millberry Care Agency Ltd. Employment Judge Hutchinson found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from Miss J Rose's wages, failed to pay her holiday entitlement, and failed to pay her notice entitlement.
The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay £1,636.20 net for the unlawful deduction from wages, £780 for holiday entitlement, and £904.40 for notice entitlement. The hearing listed for 13 August 2021 was cancelled.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages and ordered payment of the net sum of £1,636.20. | Upheld | — | £1,636 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £780. | Upheld | — | £780 |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's notice entitlement and ordered payment of £904.40. | Upheld | — | £904 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,321
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.