Case 2600811/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr. R Singh v The Viceroy — 2019
- Case reference
- 2600811/2019
- Decision date
- 17 July 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Heap
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr. R Singh
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a strike-out judgment in the case of Mr. R Singh v The Viceroy. By letter dated 25 July 2019, the Tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to make representations, or request a hearing, on why the claim should not be struck out because the claimant had not complied with the Tribunal's order of 17 July 2019 and because the claim had not been actively pursued.
The claimant did not make written representations, or did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. On that basis, Employment Judge Heap struck out the claim under rule 37. No substantive liability findings or remedy award are recorded in the extracted judgment text.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not specify the substantive claim type in the extracted text; it records only that the claim was struck out under rule 37 after non-compliance with the Tribunal's order dated 17 July 2019 and because it had not been actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 37
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.