Case 2600811/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Tracey Shaw v Savace Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 2600811/2025
- Decision date
- 8 April 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Clark
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Tracey Shaw
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was presented in the Midlands East Employment Tribunal on 8 April 2025. The respondent failed to present a valid response on time, and the Employment Judge decided that a determination of the claim could properly be made in accordance with rule 22 of the Rules of Procedure.
The tribunal found that the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and is entitled to a statutory redundancy payment of £4,694.76. The calculation was set out as £12.42 per hour multiplied by 36 hours per week, giving a weekly figure of £447.12, multiplied by 7 full years of service and a 1.5 age multiplier.
The hearing previously listed on 11 and 12 February 2026 was cancelled.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | Rule 21/22 determination after respondent failed to present a valid response on time. Statutory redundancy payment calculated as £12.42 p/h x 36 hours = £447.12 x 7 full years x 1.5 age multiplier. | Upheld | — | £4,695 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £4,695
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 22 of the Rules of Procedure
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.