Case 2600814/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs K Hromova v Pro-Driver Logistics Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 2600814/2022
- Decision date
- 8 February 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge M Butler Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs K Hromova
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy a letter dated 16 December 2022, the Tribunal gave Mrs K Hromova an opportunity to make written representations or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out because she had not obtained the consent of the Administrator or permission of the court to allow the claim to proceed. The judgment records that she did not make representations in writing, did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing.
The Tribunal therefore struck out the claim. No substantive findings were made on liability, and the judgment does not identify the underlying employment claim(s) beyond the procedural reason for strike out. No remedy was awarded.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not specify the underlying cause(s) of action. The claim was struck out because the claimant had not obtained the consent of the Administrator or permission of the court to allow the claim to proceed, and did not make sufficient representations or request a hearing in response to the Tribunal's letter dated 16 December 2022. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.