Case 2600824/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Did not attend. For the v Arnold Home Care Ltd T/a Arnold Home Care — 2024
- Case reference
- 2600824/2023
- Decision date
- 9 May 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge L Brown Appearances
- Venue
- Nottingham
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Did not attend. For the
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a preliminary hearing in public at Nottingham before Employment Judge L Brown on 25 April 2024. The claimant did not attend, and no respondent attendance is recorded in the extracted text. The claim was for unauthorised deduction from wages contrary to section 13 of the Employment Rights Act 1996.
The tribunal struck out the claim under Employment Tribunal Rule 37(1)(d) because it had not been actively pursued. No substantive determination of the underlying wages complaint was made, and no monetary award was recorded.
The written record notes that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested in time. The decision was sent to the parties on 9 May 2024.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The claimant did not attend the in-person hearing on 25 April 2024. The tribunal struck out the claim under Employment Tribunal Rule 37(1)(d) because it had not been actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- Employment Tribunal Rule 37(1)(d)
- s.13 Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.