Case 2600826/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Ms Megan Caple v Sue Davis Limited t/a Sue Davis Hair & Beauty — 2026
- Case reference
- 2600826/2025
- Decision date
- 7 August 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Welch REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms Megan Caple
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal upheld Ms Megan Caple's complaint that Sue Davis Limited, trading as Sue Davis Hair & Beauty, failed to provide her with itemised pay statements. The judgment recorded no separate monetary award for that complaint.
The Tribunal also upheld the holiday pay complaint. It found that the respondent made an unauthorised deduction from Ms Caple's wages by failing to pay for holiday accrued but not taken when her employment ended. The respondent was ordered to pay £412.80 gross, with Ms Caple responsible for any tax or National Insurance due.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Failure to provide itemised pay statements; no separate monetary award was recorded. | Upheld | — | — |
| Holiday pay | The judgment treated the unpaid accrued holiday pay as an unauthorised deduction from wages. | Upheld | — | £413 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £413
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.