Case 2600830/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Miss N Divine v L & S Accountancy Services — 2023
- Case reference
- 2600830/2023
- Decision date
- 28 November 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Michael Butler
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss N Divine
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMiss N Divine presented a claim against L & S Accountancy Services, and the claim was issued in the Midlands East Employment Tribunals on 18 April 2023. The respondent did not present a valid response on time, so Employment Judge Michael Butler determined the claim under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013.
On that basis, the tribunal found that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages. The judgment records an order that the respondent must pay the claimant £13,986.72 net.
The judgment is a short default judgment and does not set out any separate findings on other claims, remedies, or legal issues beyond the unlawful deductions finding and the sum awarded.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The respondent failed to present a valid response on time, so the Employment Judge made a Rule 21 determination on the claim. The tribunal found that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages and ordered payment of £13,986.72 net. | Upheld | — | £13,987 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £13,987
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.