Case 2600831/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Marney v Ceva Logistics Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 2600831/2019
- Decision date
- 2 August 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Swann
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M Marney
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal struck out the claimant's unfair dismissal complaint. The judgment states that, by letter dated 20 May 2019, the claimant was given an opportunity to make written representations or request a hearing as to why that complaint should not be struck out because he had not complied with the tribunal's order dated 20 May 2019.
The tribunal found that the claimant failed to make representations, or failed to make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. On that basis, the unfair dismissal complaint was struck out. The judgment also states that the claimant's remaining claim or claims remained listed for hearing on 2 August 2019.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment states only that the unfair dismissal complaint was struck out for non-compliance with the Tribunal's order dated 20 May 2019. It also states that remaining claim(s) remained listed for hearing, but does not adjudicate them. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.