Case 2600850/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Naeem v Capita IT And Networks — 2020
- Case reference
- 2600850/2020
- Decision date
- 29 July 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Victoria Butler
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J Naeem
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningIn case 2600850/2020, Mr J Naeem’s proceedings against Capita IT And Networks were recorded by Employment Judge Victoria Butler on 29 July 2020 as dismissed following a withdrawal of the claim by the claimant. The judgment is a short Rule 52 withdrawal judgment and does not contain substantive findings on liability.
No remedy, compensation, or other monetary award is recorded in the judgment, and there is no findings section dealing with the merits of the underlying employment complaints. The only recorded outcome is that the proceedings were dismissed after withdrawal.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The judgment records that the proceedings were dismissed following a withdrawal of the claim by the claimant. The gov.uk listing categories for this case include breach of contract, but the judgment itself does not set out separate merits findings. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment records that the proceedings were dismissed following a withdrawal of the claim by the claimant. The gov.uk listing categories for this case include unfair dismissal, but the judgment itself does not set out separate merits findings. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.