Case 2600857/2022 · Employment Tribunal
In person For the v No response filed and no appearance today — 2022
- Case reference
- 2600857/2022
- Decision date
- 30 August 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge P Britton
- Venue
- Nottingham
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In person For the
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe respondent did not file a response and did not appear at the closed telephone preliminary hearing. Pursuant to rule 21, the tribunal entered judgment that the claims of pregnancy related detrimental treatment and dismissal under sections 47C and 99 of the Employment Rights Act 1996, and pregnancy discrimination under section 18(2) of the Equality Act 2010, succeed.
The tribunal did not determine remedy in this judgment. It listed a separate remedy hearing and directed the claimant to provide a schedule of loss and supporting documents.
The claim for discrimination by reason of religion or philosophical belief was dismissed upon withdrawal, with the judgment recording that the relevant ET1 box had been ticked in error by the claimant.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pregnancy and maternity discrimination | Rule 21 judgment states that the claim of discrimination because of pregnancy pursuant to s18(2) Equality Act 2010 succeeds; remedy was reserved to a later hearing. | Upheld | Pregnancy and maternity | — |
| Other | Rule 21 judgment states that claims of pregnancy related detrimental treatment and dismissal pursuant to s47c and s99 Employment Rights Act 1996 succeed; the taxonomy has no separate pregnancy-related detriment or automatic unfair dismissal category, so classified as other. | Upheld | — | — |
| Religion or belief discrimination | The judgment says the religion or philosophical belief discrimination claim was dismissed upon withdrawal because the ET1 box had been ticked in error. | Withdrawn | Religion or belief | — |
Legal tests applied
4 references- rule 21 of the 2013 Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure
- s47c Employment Rights Act 1996
- s99 Employment Rights Act 1996
- s18(2) Equality Act 2010
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.