Case 2600858/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs P Skevington v Peter John Bell (deceased) T/a Trident Accountancy — 2020
- Case reference
- 2600858/2020
- Decision date
- 7 May 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Rachel Broughton
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs P Skevington
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment issued by Employment Judge Rachel Broughton. The tribunal recorded four successful claims by Mrs P Skevington against Peter John Bell (deceased) t/a Trident Accountancy: an unauthorised deduction from wages, breach of contract in respect of notice, redundancy payment, and unpaid holiday entitlement.
The judgment ordered payment of £1,383 for the wages deduction, £3,126.57 in damages for breach of contract, £4,689.90 as a redundancy payment, and £568.46 for holiday entitlement. The hearing listed for 26 June 2020 was cancelled.
The judgment contains the orders only and does not set out additional reasons, findings of fact, or a separate breakdown of the monetary awards beyond the individual sums recorded above.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay the gross/net sum of £1,383 for an unauthorised deduction from wages. | Upheld | — | £1,383 |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded damages of £3,126.57. | Upheld | — | £3,127 |
| Redundancy | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and ordered payment of £4,689.90. | Upheld | — | £4,690 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the respondent had failed to pay holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £568.46. | Upheld | — | £568 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £9,768
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.