Case 2600869/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Miss K Elliott v Spectrum Franchising Ltd T/A Rainbow International — 2024
- Case reference
- 2600869/2023
- Decision date
- 29 August 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hutchinson
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss K Elliott
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant, Miss K Elliott, brought proceedings against Spectrum Franchising Ltd T/A Rainbow International in case 2600869/2023. On 20 August 2024 the Tribunal wrote to the claimant giving an opportunity to make written representations or request a hearing as to why the claim should not be struck out on the basis that it was said to be scandalous or vexatious, that the claimant had not complied with the Tribunal's order dated 23 November 2023, and that the claim had not been actively pursued.
The claimant did not make representations in writing, or did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. The Tribunal therefore struck out the claim. No substantive merits issues were determined in the judgment.
As a result of the strike out, the hearing listed for 14 to 16 October 2024 will not take place. The judgment records no monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify or determine individual substantive claims. It strikes out the claim as a whole after the claimant failed to make representations or request a hearing in response to the Tribunal's 20 August 2024 letter, which raised possible strike-out grounds including non-compliance with the Tribunal's order of 23 November 2023 and lack of active pursuit. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.