Case 2600874/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A T Long v Armstrong Logistics Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 2600874/2023
- Decision date
- 19 December 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge R Broughton
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A T Long
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Claimant, a lorry driver, brought claims of constructive unfair dismissal, unlawful deduction from wages and breach of contract against Armstrong Logistics Ltd following his resignation on 21 February 2023. Several wage claims were withdrawn during the hearing after the Respondent paid the sums in question, and by consent the Respondent agreed to pay £160 gross for one day of annual leave (5 January 2023) which the Claimant had been required to use when his vehicle was being repaired.
The remaining wages claim concerned an alleged £154 shortfall for two weeks working nightshifts in February 2023 at a claimed nightshift hourly rate of £16.50. The Tribunal found this claim was not well founded and dismissed it.
On the constructive unfair dismissal claim, the Tribunal accepted that the Respondent's failures to pay on 31 January and 6 February 2023 amounted to breaches contributing to a potential breach of trust and confidence. However, the Tribunal concluded that as at the date of resignation (21 February 2023) the failure to pay was not yet persistent in the sense of continuing over a prolonged period, and the Respondent had not by words or conduct evinced an intention not to pay in the February payroll. The Claimant was found to have resigned prematurely in anticipation of a further breach rather than waiting to see whether payment would be made. The claim was therefore not well founded and was dismissed.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recordedThis case has mixed outcomes under at least one legal claim type. A tribunal can uphold some allegations and dismiss others under the same legal head, so rows below may represent separate issues or allegation groups from the judgment.
| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Constructive dismissal | Tribunal concluded the Claimant resigned in anticipation of a further breach but, as at the date of resignation (21 February 2023), the Respondent had not yet evinced by words or conduct an intention not to pay and the failure to pay was not yet persistent. Claim not well founded. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Claim for wages for shifts on 26 and 27 December 2022, 2 January 2023 and 15 January 2023, having been paid, dismissed on withdrawal by the Claimant. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Claim for wages for additional shifts on 12 and 19 February 2023, having been paid (£245 net), dismissed on withdrawal by the Claimant. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Claim for alleged shortfall of £154 for two weeks working nightshifts in February 2023 (claimed nightshift hourly rate of £16.50) not well founded and dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Holiday pay | By consent, the Respondent ordered to pay £160 gross for one day's accrued annual leave (5 January 2023); Respondent withdrew its defence to this claim. | Upheld |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £160
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Wellworthy Ltd v Ellis EAT 915/83
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.