Case 2600877/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr K Mahmood v Goldens (Derby) Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 2600877/2020
- Decision date
- 21 May 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Clark
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr K Mahmood
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe respondent did not present a response, so the tribunal entered judgment under rule 21. On the papers, the tribunal accepted the claimant's calculations of wages properly due under the National Minimum Wage Act 1998 and associated regulations for the two years before the claim, and found an unauthorised deduction from wages. It ordered repayment of £33,307.60 gross.
The tribunal also found that the claimant had not been paid for two weeks of annual leave taken over the 2019 Christmas period. It awarded £1,313.60 gross for that unpaid leave, but did not accept the wider request for accrued but untaken holiday while employment was continuing, saying that issue was not presently within its jurisdiction. The reasons state that the two Christmas weeks should have been paid at £328.40 per week gross.
In addition, the tribunal found that the respondent was in breach of its duty to provide a written statement of main terms and conditions under s.1(1) or 4(1) of the Employment Rights Act 1996. It made an award under s.38 of the Employment Act 2002 at the higher level of four weeks' pay and recorded an additional net sum of £2,627.20. The total award recorded by the judgment is £37,248.40.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal accepted the claimant's figures for wages properly due under the National Minimum Wage Act 1998 and associated regulations for the two years before the claim and ordered repayment of the gross sum. | Upheld | — | £33,308 |
| Holiday pay | The judgment awarded £1,313.60 gross for unpaid annual leave, while also stating that the broader complaint for accrued but untaken holiday was not presently within the tribunal's jurisdiction because employment was continuing. The reasons say two weeks over Christmas should have been paid at £328.40 per week gross. | Upheld | — | £1,314 |
| Other | Statutory uplift under s.38 of the Employment Act 2002 for failure to provide a written statement of main terms and conditions; the judgment says the awards above were increased by a further four weeks' pay and records an additional net sum of £2,627.20. | Upheld | — | £2,627 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £37,248
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
3 references- Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
- s.1(1) or 4(1) Employment Rights Act 1996
- s.38 Employment Act 2002
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.