Case 2600879/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D Mazarello v Active8 Managed Technologies IT Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 2600879/2020
- Decision date
- 15 May 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Victoria Butler
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr D Mazarello
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal dealt only with the unfair dismissal complaint. It found that Mr D Mazarello had been employed by Active8 Managed Technologies IT Ltd for less than two years, so section 108 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 prevented him from bringing an unfair dismissal claim. The claimant was given the opportunity to explain why the complaint should not be struck out, but did not give an acceptable reason.
On that basis, Employment Judge Victoria Butler struck out the unfair dismissal complaint. The judgment states that the claimant's other complaints were not affected by this decision, so they were not determined in this judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal struck out the unfair dismissal complaint because the claimant had less than two years' service and therefore was not entitled to bring the claim under section 108 Employment Rights Act 1996. The claimant was given an opportunity to explain why the claim should not be struck out but did not give an acceptable reason. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- section 108 Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.