Case 2600897/2022 · Employment Tribunal
In person For the v Did not take part — 2022
- Case reference
- 2600897/2022
- Decision date
- 30 June 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge P Britton
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In person For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Record of a Closed Telephone Preliminary Hearing heard on 30 June 2022 before Employment Judge P Britton sitting alone. The Respondent did not take part and had failed to file a Response. The judgment records that a Rule 21 notice had been sent to the Respondent on 31 May 2022.
The tribunal held that, because no Response had been filed, the claim succeeded under Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013. The remedy to which the Claimant is entitled was left to be determined at a later Remedy Hearing. That hearing was listed for Nottingham on 10 August 2022 at 10.00 am, with a time estimate of 3 hours, before an Employment Judge sitting alone. The judgment also recorded that the Respondent would only be entitled to take part to the extent permitted by the Employment Judge hearing the case.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The extracted judgment does not state the underlying factual particulars of the claim. Classification as disability discrimination is based on the official gov.uk listing category supplied with the case; the judgment itself records only that the claim succeeded under Rule 21 because the Respondent did not file a Response. | Upheld | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.