Case 2600898/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs Maureen Porter v Springhead Ales Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 2600898/2020
- Decision date
- 10 July 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ahmed Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs Maureen Porter
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal entered judgment under Rule 21 in favour of Mrs Maureen Porter against Springhead Ales Limited. It ordered the respondent to pay £18,072.95 net for unfair dismissal, with a schedule showing a basic award of £1,453.86 and a compensatory award of £16,619.09.
The tribunal also ordered £1,208.67 net in damages for breach of contract and £646.16 net in compensation for failure to provide written statements of reasons. The judgment states that the Recoupment Regulations do not apply.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The unfair dismissal award was made up of a basic award of £1,453.86 and a compensatory award of £16,619.09. | Upheld | — | £18,073 |
| Breach of contract | Damages for breach of contract were ordered at £1,208.67 net. | Upheld | — | £1,209 |
| Other | Compensation of £646.16 net was awarded for failure to provide written statements of reasons. | Upheld | — | £646 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £19,928
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £1,454
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £16,619
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.