Case 2600909/2019 · Employment Tribunal
In Person. For the v Exit Lounge Ltd — 2019
- Case reference
- 2600909/2019
- Decision date
- 9 August 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Clark Representation
- Venue
- Leicester
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In Person. For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the final hearing in Leicester on 9 August 2019, before Employment Judge Clark, the claimant appeared in person and the respondent did not attend. The tribunal therefore determined the claims on the material before it and gave oral reasons at the hearing.
The claim of unauthorised deduction from wages succeeded. The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay the claimant the net sum of £3,061.81.
The claim for holiday pay accrued but untaken at the date of termination also succeeded. The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay £2,510.74. The judgment does not separate any broader award components beyond these two sums, and it records that written reasons would not be provided unless requested.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment states that the claim of unauthorised deduction from wages succeeds and orders payment of the net sum of £3,061.81. | Upheld | — | £3,062 |
| Holiday pay | The judgment states that the claim for holiday pay accrued but untaken at the date of termination succeeds and orders payment of £2,510.74. | Upheld | — | £2,511 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £5,573
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.