Case 2600909/2023 · Employment Tribunal
In person. For the First v The White Lion Public House and Others — 2024
- Case reference
- 2600909/2023
- Decision date
- 11 November 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge L Brown Appearances
- Venue
- Nottingham
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In person. For the First
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal held that the complaints of unauthorised deductions from wages, breach of contract in relation to notice pay, holiday pay, unfair dismissal, and failure to provide a written statement of employment particulars were all well-founded. On the wages claim, it found that the Third and Fourth Respondents made unauthorised deductions from the Claimant's wages between 18 December 2022 and 1 February 2023 and ordered payment of £791.38 net.
The tribunal also upheld the notice pay claim and awarded £2,667.60 as damages for breach of contract, calculated using net pay. The holiday pay complaint was well-founded because the Claimant was not paid for holidays accrued but not taken when her employment ended, and the tribunal ordered £535.02 net.
On unfair dismissal, the tribunal found that the Claimant was unfairly dismissed by the Third and Fourth Respondents and stated that there was a nil chance she would have been fairly dismissed in any event. It recorded a basic award of £7,410.00 and a compensatory award of £9,941.33, with a total monetary award for unfair dismissal of £17,351.33.
The tribunal further found that the Third and Fourth Respondents unreasonably failed to comply with the ACAS Code of Practice on Disciplinary and Grievance Procedures 2015 and said it was just and equitable to increase the compensatory award by 25% under s 207A of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992, identifying that uplift as £2,485.33. It also found that, when the proceedings began, the Third and Fourth Respondents were in breach of their duty to provide a written statement of employment particulars, and made an award of four weeks' gross pay, namely £1,140.00, under section 38 of the Employment Act 2002.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Unauthorised deductions from wages were found for the period 18 December 2022 to 1 February 2023. | Upheld | — | £791 |
| Breach of contract | Notice pay claim; damages were assessed using net pay. | Upheld | — | £2,668 |
| Holiday pay | Failure to pay for holidays accrued but not taken when employment ended. | Upheld | — | £535 |
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal awarded a basic award of £7,410.00 and a compensatory award of £9,941.33; it also recorded a 25% ACAS Code uplift of £2,485.33 under s 207A TULR(C)A 1992. | Upheld | — | £17,351 |
| Other | Award under section 38 Employment Act 2002 for failure to provide a written statement of employment particulars. | Upheld | — | £1,140 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £17,351
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £7,410
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £9,941
- compensatory remedy recorded
Legal tests applied
3 references- ACAS Code of Practice on Disciplinary and Grievance Procedures 2015
- s 207A Trade Union & Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992
- section 38 Employment Act 2002
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.