Case 2600920/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Ms Shaunni Louise Morris v Caring at Home Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 2600920/2022
- Decision date
- 4 April 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge M Butler
- Venue
- Nottingham
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms Shaunni Louise Morris
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMs Shaunni Louise Morris presented claims for unpaid wages, holiday pay and mileage expenses against Caring at Home Limited. The respondent filed a response but did not comply with the tribunal’s orders and did not attend the hearing on 12 August 2022. The case was heard by Employment Judge M Butler sitting alone in Nottingham by video.
The claimant gave evidence explaining how she had calculated the sums said to be owed. That evidence was unchallenged, and the tribunal accepted it. Judgment was therefore entered for the claimant on each head of claim: £408 for unauthorised deductions from wages, £153 for holiday pay, and £50 for unpaid contractual mileage expenses, making a total award of £611.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal described this as gross sum of £408 in respect of unauthorised deductions from wages. | Upheld | — | £408 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal awarded holiday pay in the gross sum of £153. | Upheld | — | £153 |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal awarded unpaid contractual mileage expenses of £50. | Upheld | — | £50 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £611
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.