Case 2600936/2022 · Employment Tribunal
M Horspool v Huffey Group Limited (In Administration) — 2022
- Case reference
- 2600936/2022
- Decision date
- 8 November 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Victoria Butler
Parties
2 namedClaimant
M Horspool
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Employment Tribunal in M Horspool v Huffey Group Limited (In Administration) struck out the claim. The reasons state that, by a letter dated 12 October 2022, the tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing as to why the claim should not be struck out because it had not been actively pursued.
The claimant did not make written representations, or did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. On that basis, the tribunal struck out the claim. The judgment does not record any substantive determination of the underlying merits and does not award any remedy.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The tribunal struck out the claim because, following a letter dated 12 October 2022, the claimant failed to make written representations, failed to make sufficient representations, or failed to request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out for not being actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.