Case 2600945/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Miss D Evans v Only Care Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 2600945/2023
- Decision date
- 31 July 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Clark
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss D Evans
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe only complaint identified in the judgment was a claim for unauthorised deductions from wages brought by Miss D Evans against Only Care Ltd. The tribunal sent a letter dated 31 July 2023 giving the claimant an opportunity to make representations, or to request a hearing, on why the claim should not be struck out for not having been actively pursued.
The tribunal recorded that this letter was sent against a background where it appeared a legally binding COT3 agreement had been reached, but the claimant had not engaged with the tribunal to confirm that was the case. The claimant did not make written representations, did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing.
As a result, the tribunal struck out the complaint in its entirety. No monetary award was made and no split of remedies was recorded in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The complaint of unauthorised deductions from wages was struck out because it had not been actively pursued. The tribunal also noted that a legally binding COT3 agreement appeared to have been reached, but the claimant did not engage with the tribunal to confirm that position. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.