Case 2600955/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs K Myers v Lindsey Thomas Bathroom Design Ltd — 2024
- Case reference
- 2600955/2024
- Decision date
- 11 September 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Swann Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs K Myers
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was issued in the Midlands East Employment Tribunals on 11 June 2024. The respondent did not present a valid response on time, and the Employment Judge decided that a determination could properly be made under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013. The judgment records that the claim succeeds, but it does not set out detailed factual findings or distinguish between individual heads of claim.
No remedy was fixed in this judgment. The decision states that remedy will be determined at a Remedy Hearing, and that the hearing listed for 16 September 2024 will now be a Remedy Hearing. The judgment was sent to the parties on 11 September 2024.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The judgment records only that the claim succeeded under rule 21 and that remedy would be determined at a later hearing. The document does not break the result down between heads of claim; this classification follows the case listing supplied with the case context. | Upheld | — | — |
| Redundancy | The judgment records only that the claim succeeded under rule 21 and that remedy would be determined at a later hearing. The document does not break the result down between heads of claim; this classification follows the case listing supplied with the case context. | Upheld | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment records only that the claim succeeded under rule 21 and that remedy would be determined at a later hearing. The document does not break the result down between heads of claim; this classification follows the case listing supplied with the case context. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.