Case 2600959/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Miss. B Warrington v Splendid Restaurants (Colonel) Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 2600959/2020
- Decision date
- 1 July 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Heap
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss. B Warrington
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a rule 52 judgment on withdrawal issued by Employment Judge Heap on 30 June 2020. The judgment records that Miss B Warrington's complaints of discrimination on the grounds of age, redundancy payment, and unauthorised deductions from wages were dismissed following a withdrawal by the claimant.
The judgment also states that the remaining complaints would proceed to a hearing. No substantive findings on liability or remedy are recorded in this decision, and no monetary award is set out.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age discrimination | The judgment records that the complaint of discrimination on the grounds of age was dismissed following withdrawal by the claimant. | Withdrawn | Age | — |
| Redundancy | The judgment records that the complaint for a redundancy payment was dismissed following withdrawal by the claimant. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment records that the complaint of unauthorised deductions from wages was dismissed following withdrawal by the claimant. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.