Case 2600966/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr H Cross v S and P Garages Ltd — 2019
- Case reference
- 2600966/2019
- Decision date
- 19 August 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Swann Case
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr H Cross
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal struck out Mr H Cross's claim against S and P Garages Ltd under rule 37. The Tribunal recorded that by letter dated 8 August 2019 it had given the claimant an opportunity to make representations, or to request a hearing, on why the claim should not be struck out because he had not complied with the Tribunal's order dated 23 July 2019 and because the claim had not been actively pursued.
The claimant did not make written representations, or did not make sufficient written representations, and did not request a hearing. On that basis, the Tribunal struck out the claim. The hearing fixed for 19 August 2019 did not take place.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Struck out under rule 37 because the claimant did not comply with the Tribunal's order dated 23 July 2019 and had not actively pursued the claim. The claimant did not make sufficient written representations or request a hearing after the Tribunal's letter of 8 August 2019. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 37
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.