Case 2600970/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D Olszewski v Stoneycroft Hotel Ltd — 2019
- Case reference
- 2600970/2019
- Decision date
- 29 August 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Batten Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr D Olszewski
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment under the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013, issued by Employment Judge Batten on 29 August 2019. The tribunal found that Stoneycroft Hotel Ltd had made unauthorised deductions from Mr D Olszewski's wages and ordered payment of £438.48 gross.
The tribunal also found that the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded £175.39 net in damages. It further found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered £2,474.00 gross. The total sum awarded was £3,087.87.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found unauthorised deductions from wages and ordered payment of £438.48 gross. | Upheld | — | £438 |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found the dismissal was in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded £175.39 net in damages. | Upheld | — | £175 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered £2,474.00 gross. | Upheld | — | £2,474 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,088
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.