Case 2600974/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr S Khandelwal v Virgin Media Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 2600974/2020
- Decision date
- 14 February 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Jeram
- Venue
- via CVP at Newcastle
- Panel members
- Mr O'Connor, Ms Woodward
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr S Khandelwal
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant complained of direct race discrimination and unfair constructive dismissal arising from the respondent's handling of concerns about 'cancel and resign' sales practices. The tribunal accepted that the claimant had allowed customers to use his device to cancel services so that new contracts could be entered, but found that his manager knew of, condoned and actively facilitated the practice, and that other sales advisers were also involved.
The tribunal found that the respondent breached the implied term of trust and confidence. It held that the 29 November 2019 meeting between the claimant and his manager, shortly before a scheduled meeting, was conducted without reasonable and proper cause and put the claimant under pressure to resign. The tribunal also said it would have found that aspects of the investigation and suspension lacked reasonable and proper cause. The claimant resigned at least in part because of the respondent's breach, so the unfair constructive dismissal claim succeeded.
The direct race discrimination claims were dismissed. The tribunal found that the claimant had not shown that he was treated less favourably because of race in relation to the individual meeting, the instruction about stopping 'cancel and resigns', suspension, the advice to resign, or the constructive dismissal allegation. It found other non-race reasons for the treatment, including the Manila data concerning the claimant's iPad and the manager's wish to minimise the risk of the claimant implicating others.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Race discrimination | The claimant brought direct race discrimination claims based on being of Indian origin and brown colour. The tribunal found the claims were not well founded and dismissed them. | Dismissed | Race | — |
| Constructive dismissal | The tribunal described the successful claim as unfair constructive dismissal. Remedy was reserved for a separate hearing. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
12 references- s.94 ERA 1996
- s.95(1)(c) ERA 1996
- Malik v Bank of Credit and Commerce International SA
- Leeds Dental Team Ltd v Rose
- Kaur v Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust
- s.13 Equality Act 2010
- s.23 Equality Act 2010
- s.136 Equality Act 2010
- Igen Ltd v Wong
- Hewage v Grampian Health Board
- Madarassy v Nomura International plc
- Shamoon v Chief Constable of the RUC
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.