Case 2600975/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Miss Melissa Wright v Northstar One Group Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 2600975/2023
- Decision date
- 22 January 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hutchinson
- Venue
- Nottingham Heard
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss Melissa Wright
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Hutchinson sat alone at Nottingham on 16 January 2024. The Claimant, Miss Melissa Wright, appeared in person and the Respondent did not appear. Judgment was given orally at the hearing, with the written record dated 19 January 2024 and sent to the parties on 22 January 2024.
The tribunal upheld the Claimant's claim for unauthorised deductions from wages and ordered the Respondent to pay £772.58 gross. It also upheld the Claimant's claim for breach of contract in respect of notice, finding that she had been dismissed in breach of contract and awarding damages of £2,013.24.
The tribunal further found that the Claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and was entitled to a redundancy payment of £3,187.63. The total sum payable by the Respondent was £5,973.45.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found the Respondent had made unauthorised deductions from wages and ordered payment of £772.58 gross. | Upheld | — | £773 |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found the Claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded damages of £2,013.24. | Upheld | — | £2,013 |
| Redundancy | The tribunal found the Claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and awarded a redundancy payment of £3,187.63. | Upheld | — | £3,188 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £5,973
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.