Case 2600977/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Miss K Shackleton-Smith v Horizon Care and Education Group Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 2600977/2022
- Decision date
- 19 January 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Smith
- Venue
- Leicester
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss K Shackleton-Smith
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMiss K Shackleton-Smith did not attend the hearing on 19 January 2023 and no reason for her non-attendance was provided. The respondent attended by solicitor, Mr L Ashwood. Employment Judge Smith sat alone at Leicester.
The judgment records that, because of the claimant's non-attendance, the claim was dismissed under rule 47 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013. The tribunal did not determine the substantive merits of the underlying claim.
No remedy was awarded. The judgment also states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would only be provided if requested in writing within 14 days of the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment states that the Claimant did not attend the hearing and no reason was provided. The claim was dismissed under rule 47 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 47 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.