Case 2600978/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Cooper v NIFES Property Limited t/a NIFES Consulting Group — 2018
- Case reference
- 2600978/2018
- Decision date
- 3 December 2018
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Blackwell
- Venue
- Nottingham
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M Cooper
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr Cooper appeared in person and the Respondent was represented by Mr R Hughes. Employment Judge Blackwell sat alone at Nottingham on 23 November 2018. The tribunal held that it had jurisdiction to hear all of the Claimant's claims because the early conciliation certificate R124398/18/92, issued in the trading name NIFES Consultancy Group, was sufficient. The reasons note that NIFES Consultancy Group was the trading name of NIFES Property Limited, and the tribunal relied on Mist v Derby Community NHS Trust [2016] ICR 543 for the proposition that naming the trading name in the early conciliation certificate was enough. The tribunal also noted that this meant the claims were served in time, as had been agreed in an earlier case management summary.
The only substantive disposals recorded were withdrawals. The Claimant's claim for failure to pay notice pay was dismissed on withdrawal by the Claimant, and the Respondent's contract claim was dismissed on withdrawal by the Respondent. No merits findings or compensation award were made.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Described in the judgment as a claim for failure to pay notice pay; dismissed on withdrawal by the Claimant. The judgment does not give a fuller statutory label for the claim. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Breach of contract | Described only as the Respondent's contract claim; dismissed on withdrawal by the Respondent. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Mist v Derby Community NHS Trust [2016] ICR 543
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.