Case 2600982/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Miss J Sekula v Pow Nottingham Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 2600982/2019
- Decision date
- 4 December 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Adkinson
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss J Sekula
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment records that Miss J Sekula withdrew the claim against Pow Nottingham Limited. The tribunal therefore dismissed the proceedings under rule 52 and did not make findings on the merits of any underlying complaint.
No remedy assessment is recorded, and the judgment does not identify any substantive legal test applied to determine liability because the case ended on withdrawal before a merits decision was reached.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment states that the proceedings were dismissed following a withdrawal of the claim by the claimant. No substantive findings on liability are recorded. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.