Case 2600985/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Jamie Dunbar v Creative Marketing Support Limited Record of an Attended Hearing at the Employment Tribunal — 2024
- Case reference
- 2600985/2023
- Decision date
- 26 June 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hutchinson
- Venue
- Nottingham Heard
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Jamie Dunbar
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Hutchinson, sitting alone at Nottingham on 17 June 2024, heard the claim in the absence of the respondent, who did not appear. The claimant was represented by Mr Andrew Botham, solicitor. The judgment records that the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice, was dismissed by reason of redundancy, and was unfairly dismissed.
The tribunal also found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and had failed to provide the claimant with a statement of terms and conditions of employment. Monetary awards were made against the respondent on each of these heads: £898.14 for breach of contract (notice), £1,089.64 as a redundancy payment, £2,833.06 for unpaid holiday, £16,342.45 as compensation for unfair dismissal, and £2,179.28 in respect of the failure to provide a written statement of terms.
In addition, the respondent was ordered to pay a contribution of £1,000 towards the claimant's costs. The judgment was signed by Employment Judge Hutchinson dated 20 June 2024 and sent to the parties on 26 June 2024. The judgment text itself does not articulate the underlying reasoning, legal tests, or factual findings beyond the orders made.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice; damages of £898.14 awarded. | Upheld | — | £898 |
| Redundancy | Claimant dismissed by reason of redundancy; entitled to redundancy payment of £1,089.64. | Upheld | — | £1,090 |
| Holiday pay | Respondent failed to pay claimant's holiday entitlement; £2,833.06 awarded. | Upheld | — | £2,833 |
| Unfair dismissal | Claimant was unfairly dismissed; compensation of £16,342.45 awarded. | Upheld | — | £16,342 |
| Other | Respondent failed to provide a statement of terms and conditions of employment; £2,179.28 awarded. Not separately enumerated as a §4.4 claim_type; classified as 'other'. | Upheld | — | £2,179 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £24,343
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £16,342
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.