Case 2601045/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Gorse Covert Community Association Ltd v Green Heart Wash Ltd — 2019
- Case reference
- 2601045/2019
- Decision date
- 16 August 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Faulkner
- Venue
- Leicester
- Panel members
- Ms J Dean, Mr K Rose
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Gorse Covert Community Association Ltd
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at Leicester on 15 August 2019 before Employment Judge Faulkner with Ms J Dean and Mr K Rose. The claimant did not attend. The respondent was represented by counsel.
The tribunal held that there was no relevant transfer under the Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) Regulations 2006 from the respondent to the claimant on 1 September 2018 or at any other time. On that basis, the claimant’s complaint that the respondent had failed to comply with regulation 11 of the Regulations was found not well-founded and was dismissed.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Transfer of undertakings (TUPE) | The tribunal found there was no relevant transfer under the Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) Regulations 2006 from the respondent to the claimant on 1 September 2018 or otherwise, so the complaint under regulation 11 was not well-founded. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- regulation 11 of the Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) Regulations 2006
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.